「抄襲」不是用「兩個文本擁有相同的一句話」就可以定義的。503Please respect copyright.PENANAzwUjs21by6
503Please respect copyright.PENANAUP2XexIrWB
書名和標題也是,撞句、撞名不能算抄襲,「抄襲」是很嚴重的指控,在指控他人抄襲時,要先把證據擺出來。503Please respect copyright.PENANA8CGK8uAoZX
503Please respect copyright.PENANAGY83c9jgOr
這就是「舉證之所在,敗訴之所在」。503Please respect copyright.PENANAMn369ak7x5
503Please respect copyright.PENANAJqHrRsFwa9
翻成白話文就是:提告者要負舉證之責任,如果證據不足或不被採用,則可能導致敗訴。503Please respect copyright.PENANAbQ3541bD0w
503Please respect copyright.PENANAyBEhrSviL4
【全國法規資料庫:著作權法】503Please respect copyright.PENANAIX2zleedG9
503Please respect copyright.PENANA1xXSOqN4Ii
reurl.cc/OvGelX503Please respect copyright.PENANAb6QH22OgAe
503Please respect copyright.PENANAtfA8teFdoz
【著作權筆記:「抄襲」有無明確的定義】503Please respect copyright.PENANASIKatY63Os
503Please respect copyright.PENANAr1WJXCP53C
reurl.cc/RzWQx9503Please respect copyright.PENANAAl8YjiZcOE
503Please respect copyright.PENANAwJzy1OCBzR
【音樂侵權的認定,更複雜】503Please respect copyright.PENANAYlHDDyEORN
503Please respect copyright.PENANAWkhqoVqdMX
crossing.cw.com.tw/article/16062503Please respect copyright.PENANAP0L6EC1TTj
503Please respect copyright.PENANAgA3J2bZPu4
這裡說明一下:法律並沒有「抄襲」字樣,著作權法和「抄襲」有關的是「重製」、「改作」。503Please respect copyright.PENANAZh4wK3btIs
503Please respect copyright.PENANAzLnQhLojZb
然後,學術上的認定比法律嚴格,因為法律是社會的安全網,算是底線,如果太過嚴格,會導致民眾動不動就觸法,也會讓有心人士拿著法條當攻擊武器 (我一直認為法條是防禦/護身武器,而非攻擊武器),這也是為何法律非常重視程序和證據的主因。