x

「抄襲」不是用「兩個文本擁有相同的一句話」就可以定義的。498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡtiZLAij9zS
498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡO1Sv3m2ofF
書名和標題也是，撞句、撞名不能算抄襲，「抄襲」是很嚴重的指控，在指控他人抄襲時，要先把證據擺出來。498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ42NQNjZuFG
498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡAEECrqFbms
這就是「舉證之所在，敗訴之所在」。498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡUEVQu0slZw
498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡhpP0zDqAVO
翻成白話文就是：提告者要負舉證之責任，如果證據不足或不被採用，則可能導致敗訴。498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ5LwqsUxwvj
498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡhGs9MiVjCb
【全國法規資料庫：著作權法】498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ7UMgidYV6e
498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡxVEKwbQahc
reurl.cc/OvGelX498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ8IbCUb8pzr
498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡJpeITHe4LG
【著作權筆記：「抄襲」有無明確的定義】498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ2EFcE8UpA9
498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡc8ZGNgKrsS
reurl.cc/RzWQx9498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡNfve0Cvn9H
498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡWGJ6x1RRFN
【音樂侵權的認定，更複雜】498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡtzmcK0ElAX
498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡUuyUb9gRQJ
crossing.cw.com.tw/article/16062498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡGTZbbe7Gqt
498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡXRmcSgLIGS
這裡說明一下：法律並沒有「抄襲」字樣，著作權法和「抄襲」有關的是「重製」、「改作」。498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡMYTGlnfM6v
498Please respect copyright.ＰＥＮＡＮＡ7Mt78Abblg
然後，學術上的認定比法律嚴格，因為法律是社會的安全網，算是底線，如果太過嚴格，會導致民眾動不動就觸法，也會讓有心人士拿著法條當攻擊武器 (我一直認為法條是防禦/護身武器，而非攻擊武器)，這也是為何法律非常重視程序和證據的主因。8964 copyright protection494ＰＥＮＡＮＡm2rFvmSk3N 維尼

216.73.216.94