多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:564Please respect copyright.PENANAIFzQsgL3E2
564Please respect copyright.PENANARf4RV5lEP4
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?564Please respect copyright.PENANAZO2E2rxrCB
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區564Please respect copyright.PENANAGeo2hvclRm
https://lih.kg/2544217564Please respect copyright.PENANAjGXTZcItNs
564Please respect copyright.PENANAjXLaduGlhT
564Please respect copyright.PENANAvQIQkxiiQV
圖片摘取自Ref1及2564Please respect copyright.PENANAKM7ailEYTD564Please respect copyright.PENANAbv3RkGGkBJ
564Please respect copyright.PENANA6zFDuD8oXF
564Please respect copyright.PENANAhvK6dLY9zj
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。564Please respect copyright.PENANAyHzDFZ0Tju
564Please respect copyright.PENANAKi4WvzmE9d
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。564Please respect copyright.PENANAnXYlL8MZ3M
564Please respect copyright.PENANAsnrjyXRtEq
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。564Please respect copyright.PENANAneQCavnn4o
564Please respect copyright.PENANAmL4RVHODIw
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。564Please respect copyright.PENANAnUH0kHsFjH
564Please respect copyright.PENANAAPUnRy2Jnn
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5564Please respect copyright.PENANAmfsQRW0zgE
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
564Please respect copyright.PENANAnREUEQ101N