多謝巴絲們的指正,以下為此Post的更正:547Please respect copyright.PENANArONpZ8hvZk
547Please respect copyright.PENANA2CNu8RKby4
三十秒科學–種樹是否一定能夠減低大氣二氧化碳含量?547Please respect copyright.PENANALuNjoxQ1x2
- 分享自 LIHKG 討論區547Please respect copyright.PENANAxAPF1buZKb
https://lih.kg/2544217547Please respect copyright.PENANArIhLoBS9FT
547Please respect copyright.PENANAmORZ2eReio
547Please respect copyright.PENANAAsuOPWDKU5
圖片摘取自Ref1及2547Please respect copyright.PENANASzFdmhLkAQ547Please respect copyright.PENANAch0dFfo4s5
547Please respect copyright.PENANAcv4TNcvVJd
547Please respect copyright.PENANAFKW3wls2WV
研究中指出草叢/部份樹木因配合泥土菌類獲取營養方式的不同,雖長得比較矮小,但能夠在泥土儲存較多的碳原子。547Please respect copyright.PENANAWtOayWrfDc
547Please respect copyright.PENANAWZpJzLasVi
而部分樹木因依靠泥土中的菌類幫忙,得以長得更高,而與此同時泥土相關的菌類則會釋放出更多的二氧化碳。547Please respect copyright.PENANAbGbqCg8RJ4
547Please respect copyright.PENANAJinVpgNgCw
雖然長大較高的樹木比較低的草叢有更強的能力透過光合作用儲存碳原子,但相應地,助長樹木生長的菌類亦會從泥土中釋發出比助長草叢生長的菌類更多的二氧化碳。547Please respect copyright.PENANAD2uISEE1IT
547Please respect copyright.PENANA1IC2rB5E4W
研究中並無證據直接顯示草叢吸取大氣二氧化碳的能力比樹木更高,上一篇我引述錯誤,若然引起任何誤會,希望可以見諒。547Please respect copyright.PENANAv9hN16BGza
547Please respect copyright.PENANAIwKWGw3ahM
Ref1:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01117-5547Please respect copyright.PENANAQihJms2nFo
Ref2:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00737-1
547Please respect copyright.PENANAePCLfTMSJv